An organisation substitutes one convenient source for a sample when reporting what people in general think, because a single reliable source supplies a usable opinion on demand.
Greg Packer, a highway maintenance worker from Huntington, New York, made a hobby from 1995 of being the quotable member of the public: first in line at launches, signings and inaugurations, and always giving his real name. He was quoted in hundreds of articles, and in 2003 the Associated Press circulated a memo noting that a Nexis search had turned up around a hundred mentions and instructing reporters to be equally eager to find somebody else. That June he had been the centrepiece of a New York Times street interview on public feeling about Hillary Clinton's memoir. Three things sustain the pattern and only the first is laziness: the source wants to be found, and the organisation wants an opinion it can rely on arriving on time.
In practice
- A chief executive tells the board he has sounded out the staff and they are behind it, having spoken to one friend on the fifth floor.
- A council that consults the same three residents' association officers every time has a consultation process and no idea what the estate thinks.
- Possible explanations
- The explanation is cost: sampling opinion is expensive and a known, quotable source is cheap, so the reliable respondent displaces the representative one. Editorial deadlines make the substitution routine rather than deliberate.
- In its favour
- The Packer case documents the journalistic version in detail, and news organisations have since issued instructions against using him, which is an admission that the substitution happened.
- Against it
- It is a coinage for this ledger rather than an established term, and the wider organisational tendency it names, of one convenient source standing for a population, has not been measured.
- Standing
- A coinage for this ledger rather than an established term. The Packer case documents the journalistic instance; the wider organisational tendency it names has not been measured.
- Subject
- Communication & Media
- Essay
- Theories of what stands between an event and its audience