Judgement quality degrades across a long sequence of decisions, biasing towards defaults.
The 2011 Israeli parole study reported sharp session-order effects, but later analysis showed the case ordering was not random and identified confounds including legal representation and prison scheduling. The ego-depletion mechanism has also largely failed to replicate, so neither the field study nor the lab account is clean evidence.
In practice
- A recruiter reviewing forty CVs picks more conventionally at 5pm than at 10am, and would deny it.
- A shopper who has compared eleven washing machines buys the one the salesperson recommends, having stopped deciding an hour ago.
- Possible explanations
- One explanation is depletion, in which the capacity for deliberate control runs down with use. Another is motivation, since people become less willing rather than less able. A third is scheduling, where what looks like fatigue tracks breaks, case order and workload.
- In its favour
- Defaults do dominate decisions made late in long sequences, and the pattern has been reported in several field settings.
- Against it
- Ego depletion, the mechanism behind it, has largely failed to replicate, and the parole study most often cited has been challenged for non-random case ordering and confounds.
- Standing
- Ego depletion has largely failed to replicate, and the parole field study has been challenged on non-random case ordering and confounds.
- Further reading
- Wikipedia
- Subject
- Decision-making & Reasoning
- Essay
- The catalogue of predictable errors